Published by MARE, April 2010
Proactive Measures Your District Can Take Now
On February 1, 2010, Mickes Goldman O’Toole celebrated its two year anniversary. And in the past two years alone, the firm’s special education department has handled approximately sixty OCR complaints against districts across the state of Missouri, each alleging discrimination on the basis of disability. In addition, the firm continues to handle numerous OCR complaints with respect to other protected classes, including race and gender.
The substance of the disability related complaints has run the gamut, from a parent’s allegation of disability discrimination because the district in question refused to continue its daily practice of microwaving frozen pizza for her son, to the more typical allegations of failure to implement a student’s Individualized Education Program (“IEP”) or Section 504 Plan, or failure to identify and/or evaluate a student under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”) and/or Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Section 504”).
The majority of the disability related OCR complaints filed against the firm’s school district clients have resulted in “insufficient findings”, which is essentially OCR’s way of stating that the district in question did nothing wrong. Still, a significant number of the complaints have unfortunately resulted in negative findings.
In those instances, the district in question is asked to sign a “Resolution Agreement” to remedy the deficiencies. OCR has also recently begun offering “302 Agreements” in which the District may affirmatively request a resolution agreement prior to the conclusion of OCR’s investigation.
In almost every Resolution Agreement or 302 Agreement this firm has been involved with, OCR has requested that the district change some aspect of an existing policy or procedure, make assurances that the district will actually follow its written policy and/or procedure, and/or train its staff regarding the policy and procedure.
The difference between policy and procedure (also called “regulation”) is often confused by school district patrons and even school district staff. Such confusion can cause difficulty when responding to an OCR complaint or attempting to close an OCR complaint via a Resolution Agreement. A policy should represent a general statement of a school board’s position regarding a specific issue. Policies should be board approved. In contrast, this firm strongly recommends that procedures should not be board approved. This approach allows school districts the flexibility to modify their procedures on an as-needed basis, and often in response to a quickly changing area of school law.
Another issue that has arisen lately is that districts have multiple policies and procedures that address the same issue, but are internally inconsistent. For example, many districts are utilizing a private company’s written Section 504 Procedures. Some of those same districts are also using policies and procedures drafted by one of several policy service agencies. The firm has discovered that, at times, the set of 504 procedures may be inconsistent or incompatible with the applicable policy and/or procedure issued by a policy service agency.
Also, OCR has regularly required districts to modify their Notice of Non-Discrimination and post the notice in more prominent locations, such as student and personnel handbooks and district websites. OCR has a Sample Notice posted on its website at http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/nondisc.html. The firm encourages school districts to utilize the Sample Notice without variation and review posting sites to ensure that the notice is clearly visible and accessible.
In summary, school districts should take the following proactive measures now, in order to put the district in the best possible position if an OCR complaint is filed. Taking the following proactive measures may even prevent some complaints from ever reaching OCR’s door.
- 1. Annually review your district’s policies and procedures to check for the following:
- a. Are my policies and procedures consistent with relevant law?
b. Are my policies and procedures internally consistent?
c. Can my district’s administrators live with these policies and procedures and do they work for my district?
2. Make sure that the policies and procedures your district utilizes are implemented as written. Too often the firm has seen school districts have a specific policy or procedure “on the books” but, in practice, the districts’ administrators do things differently from what the policies or procedures dictate. To this end, staff must be trained on existing policies and procedures and informed when changes are made.
3. Ensure that your Notice of Non-Discrimination is consistent with OCR’s sample notice and that your notice is posted in prominent locations.
© 2010 Mickes Goldman O’Toole, LLC
- Arming Your District Against OCR: Proactive Measures Your District Can Take Now – By: Alefia E. Mithaiwala & Thomas A. Mickes
- Recent Eighth Circuit Case Law: A Lesson in What Not to Do in Disciplining Disabled Students – By: Alefia Mithaiwala
- Seclusion and Restraint In Missouri Schools – By: Alefia E. Mithaiwala